Study online to complete your 30 hour OSHA Construction Training.
OSHA recommends Outreach Training Program courses as an orientation to occupational safety and health for workers. Workers must receive additional training, when required by OSHA standards, on the specific hazards of their job.
This Course covers thirty (30) hours of courses, required by the Occupational Health and Safety Act (OSHA) that apply toward 30-hour Construction Industry course completion card. This module is comprised of 24 sections, each either one or two hours in length, and covering topics pertaining to regulations covered by Standard 29 CFR 1926. The successful completion of this course will help to meet the Construction Industry standards established by OSHA.
You will also find supplementary materials available for download by clicking the ""Materials"" tab on the menu located within the courseplayer. You can find printable course summaries of each module in addition to a syllabus of the entire 30 hour course. Other reference materials are available from the OSHA website; please visit www.osha.gov.
When taking this course, please be aware of the time limits on both your login session and the course itself. For your login session, please feel free to take as long as you wish at any given time, but be aware that if you remain idle (staying on the same page) for 15 minutes then you will be logged out of the session and you will have to log in and rejoin the course where stopped previously.
As for the course itself, please remember that you have six months from the time you signed up for this course to complete it in order to receive credit. After six months, your account will expire and you will be required to purchase the course again if you wish to complete it.
At the end of each module, you will be given a 10 question module quiz. You must score at least 70% on each module quiz to move forward in the course. You will be given up to three opportunities to pass each module quiz. Failure to successfully pass the quiz will result in being locked out of the course and not allowed to continue with an online training format for your outreach training.
Once you have successfully completed all of the modules, you must pass a final exam to receive full credit for the course. The exam is 20 questions long and will test your knowledge on information covered throughout the course. You must make a score of at least 70% to pass this course. You will be given up to three opportunities to pass the final exam; if you do not pass it after three tries, you will be locked out of this course will no longer be able to take your outreach training in an online format.
View:
30 Hour OSHA Construction Course
Monday, February 6, 2012
Thursday, July 28, 2011
OSHA Compliance
The Complete Guide to OSHA Compliance is an easy-to-understand, one-stop resource designed to help safety professionals, industrial hygienists, and human resources personnel ensure compliance with existing and upcoming OSHA regulations. This essential book explains employer and employee rights and responsibilities, and it provides everything you need to know about employer standards and standards for specific operations.
The Complete Guide to OSHA Compliance describes the process of injury/illness recordkeeping and the reporting system required by OSHA. It also explains how to conduct a self-audit to determine whether a company is in full compliance. Furthermore, it informs companies of their rights in an inspection and explains how to handle citations and appeals, should they arise.
The Complete Guide to OSHA Compliance describes the process of injury/illness recordkeeping and the reporting system required by OSHA. It also explains how to conduct a self-audit to determine whether a company is in full compliance. Furthermore, it informs companies of their rights in an inspection and explains how to handle citations and appeals, should they arise.
Wednesday, October 20, 2010
First Responder Online Training - Responder Credits
View and begin our virtual university online first responder course training for awareness and operation level 1.
Operations Level 1
This level training is designed for all employees who respond to a hazardous materials emergency. OSHA 29 CFR 1910.120 indicates that all employees who respond to a hazardous materials emergency must receive training based on their level of activities at the incident.
Awareness level online is for responders who are likely to witness or discover a hazardous materials release and will initiate a response sequence by notifying the proper authorities of the release.
Monday, March 22, 2010
Certified Environmental Specialist Course
Global career schools provides online courses to become a certified environmental specialist. 24 hour course to complete training.
Fast and approved online courses
This course is designed for environmental professionals who want to maximize their environmental compliance and ensure public safety in the workplace.
This course provides essential knowledge and understanding of EPA regulations relating to hazardous wastes such as the Clean Air Act (CAA), Clean Water Act (CWA), RCRA, EPCRA, TSCA and CERCLA.
The course will enable those who successfully complete the qualifications to implement updated environmental compliance programs at their facility.
Discuss updated major environmental laws and regulations
discuss the purpose and requirements of the Clean Air Act
Describe the background and requirements of the RCRA
Properly identify different types of hazardous waste according to RCRA regulations
Implement hazardous waste management systems to achieve and maintain compliance
Apply different features of the Clean Water Act in day-to-day operations
explain regulatory and management issues relating to Storm Water Discharges
Identify the requirements of your SPCC plan
24 hour online courses Begin Here:
Certified Environmental Online Course
Fast and approved online courses
This course is designed for environmental professionals who want to maximize their environmental compliance and ensure public safety in the workplace.
This course provides essential knowledge and understanding of EPA regulations relating to hazardous wastes such as the Clean Air Act (CAA), Clean Water Act (CWA), RCRA, EPCRA, TSCA and CERCLA.
The course will enable those who successfully complete the qualifications to implement updated environmental compliance programs at their facility.
Discuss updated major environmental laws and regulations
discuss the purpose and requirements of the Clean Air Act
Describe the background and requirements of the RCRA
Properly identify different types of hazardous waste according to RCRA regulations
Implement hazardous waste management systems to achieve and maintain compliance
Apply different features of the Clean Water Act in day-to-day operations
explain regulatory and management issues relating to Storm Water Discharges
Identify the requirements of your SPCC plan
24 hour online courses Begin Here:
Certified Environmental Online Course
Tuesday, March 9, 2010
HACCP Food Safety Course
Study online with our HACCP Food Safety Course
HACCP proves that what you do or don’t do makes a big difference in serving safe food. The goal of HACCP is to stop, control, and prevent food safety problems. Our goal for you in this module is for you to become a HACCP Superstar!
Category
Public Safety
Course Format
SCORM Online Course
Course Description
Every operation serving or selling food needs to have a food safety system in place that is designed specifically to guarantee the food being served is safe to eat. This specific food safety system is called HACCP for Hazard Analysis and Critical Control Point. HACCP is a system comprised of 7 principles that are to be applied to a written food safety program focusing on the food in your operation. This course aims to teach you the importance and use of all 7 principles in order to make you a safer, more effective food service employee.
Start HACCP FOOD SAFETY Training
Seat Time
N/A
Course Credit
Four hours
Course Level if Applicable
Basic
Learning Objectives
By the time you finish this course you will be able to:
Identify the causes of food borne illness
Identify the key points of HACCP
Explain the 7 HACCP principles
Follow prerequisite programs for food safety
Apply standard operating procedures for food safety and food defense in your operation
Identify the three classifications of recipes
Determine critical control points
Apply critical control limits
Complete monitoring forms
Determine effective corrective actions
Topics Covered
The following topics are covered during this course:
Prerequisite Programs
Food Defense
Hazard Analysis
Determining Critical Control Points
Critical Limits
Monitoring
Corrective Actions
Verification
Record Keeping
Regulatory Requirements
In compliance with 2005 FDA code
Course Reporting Requirements
N/A
Course Prerequisites
N/A
Testing
Refers to the minimum required passing scores, as applicable, to:
Pre-quizzes – N/A
Lesson quizzes – N/A
Final exam – N/A
Course Completion
Passing grade of 70% or higher needed to be certified.
Upon completion of this course, please print your certificate to demonstrate that you are certified in HACCP principles for two years from the date of completion.
Begin HACCP FOOD SAFETY COURSES - or view more
HACCP proves that what you do or don’t do makes a big difference in serving safe food. The goal of HACCP is to stop, control, and prevent food safety problems. Our goal for you in this module is for you to become a HACCP Superstar!
Category
Public Safety
Course Format
SCORM Online Course
Course Description
Every operation serving or selling food needs to have a food safety system in place that is designed specifically to guarantee the food being served is safe to eat. This specific food safety system is called HACCP for Hazard Analysis and Critical Control Point. HACCP is a system comprised of 7 principles that are to be applied to a written food safety program focusing on the food in your operation. This course aims to teach you the importance and use of all 7 principles in order to make you a safer, more effective food service employee.
Start HACCP FOOD SAFETY Training
Seat Time
N/A
Course Credit
Four hours
Course Level if Applicable
Basic
Learning Objectives
By the time you finish this course you will be able to:
Identify the causes of food borne illness
Identify the key points of HACCP
Explain the 7 HACCP principles
Follow prerequisite programs for food safety
Apply standard operating procedures for food safety and food defense in your operation
Identify the three classifications of recipes
Determine critical control points
Apply critical control limits
Complete monitoring forms
Determine effective corrective actions
Topics Covered
The following topics are covered during this course:
Prerequisite Programs
Food Defense
Hazard Analysis
Determining Critical Control Points
Critical Limits
Monitoring
Corrective Actions
Verification
Record Keeping
Regulatory Requirements
In compliance with 2005 FDA code
Course Reporting Requirements
N/A
Course Prerequisites
N/A
Testing
Refers to the minimum required passing scores, as applicable, to:
Pre-quizzes – N/A
Lesson quizzes – N/A
Final exam – N/A
Course Completion
Passing grade of 70% or higher needed to be certified.
Upon completion of this course, please print your certificate to demonstrate that you are certified in HACCP principles for two years from the date of completion.
Begin HACCP FOOD SAFETY COURSES - or view more
Monday, August 24, 2009
24 hour Hazwoper class training - 24 hr online Hazwoper school
Global Career Schools provides our updated 24 hour OSHA Hazwoper online training class for Hazwoper credit. School course allows students to earn their 24 hour, 40 or 8 hr credits.
Our virtual online section has an approved online Hazwoper 40 hour training class for OSHA students needing to fulfill their certification requirements in Hazwoper training. Each topic comes with section exams and a final OSHA exam at the end of the training.
40 hr
For students needing to complete a 24 hour training session for Hazwoper credit - our online class will do it quickly for you.
All OSHA topics are fully approved. Students receive support during and after the 24 hr course is completed.
The topics covered include
Regulations
Toxicology
Hazards
Site Control
Decontamination
Air Monitoring - including Radiological Hazards
Chemical Awareness and Prudence
Dozens more...
BEGIN NOW OR VIEW FREE DEMO
Our virtual online section has an approved online Hazwoper 40 hour training class for OSHA students needing to fulfill their certification requirements in Hazwoper training. Each topic comes with section exams and a final OSHA exam at the end of the training.
40 hr
For students needing to complete a 24 hour training session for Hazwoper credit - our online class will do it quickly for you.
All OSHA topics are fully approved. Students receive support during and after the 24 hr course is completed.
The topics covered include
Regulations
Toxicology
Hazards
Site Control
Decontamination
Air Monitoring - including Radiological Hazards
Chemical Awareness and Prudence
Dozens more...
BEGIN NOW OR VIEW FREE DEMO
Thursday, May 14, 2009
Business Safety Cost
How to toe the line and help foot the bill for safety costs
“Toe the line or foot the bill” is OSHA’s motto and few would disagree with it. Economising on safety costs is something few would argue with either. So, here's a safety shoe alternative you should know about. Rubber overshoe safety toe caps - ' shoes with toes' - are getting more attention, for more reasons than simply cost-effectiveness. And not just because of the ever increasing numbers of temporary workers employed in this country. It's the ever increasing cost of providing fully-loaded temporary safety shoes that's bringing the whole matter of toe protection to the attention of senior management. The recent challenge by the United States Postal Service and OSHA's ruling attests to that. Anywhere a safety shoe alternative exists, that sits all right with OSHA in the USA or CCOHS in Canada, it's a win-win situation.
There’s not a thing wrong with generally accepted safety toe cap footwear, but all too often it seems the expensive choice is selected out of fear or a lack of understanding. Although it's true to say safety shoe policies in manufacturing have embraced rubber pull on safety toe cap products for visitors they have been 'missing in action' elsewhere. I know of one particular food processing plant that refuses to use a '”better than those yellow clacker things” solution, but tolerates gunk that might be introduced to the production floor on the soles of visitors' shoes. Their thinking is they had better address the greasy floors than more effectively provide toe protection. Some might argue the greasy floor is a hazard that should not be tolerated.
All employers are subject to statutory requirements and minimum standards that reflect our desire to protect workers. It is up to the employer to implement safety rules and regulations but bodies such as OSHA allows significant latitude in doing so, provided choices are reasonable and done responsibly. Careful attention is required as errors in judgement, as with willful neglect, will be punished under the law. Unfortunately, the tendency in a fear and compliance atmosphere is to avoid failure rather than attempt success. Compliance is commendable but can instill fear. That can stifle creativity which can result in unnecessarily high costs.
Take the whole matter of safety footwear. Company safety policies that lack creativity can result in over-spending far in excess of the typical fine for a safety transgression. It's a bit like this; we know there's always the possibility of rain but do we need to wear a raincoat every day? Or, would a small umbrella, costing a lot less than a raincoat, do the job just as well? Throw in the ability to offer others shelter if the need arises and you get the idea.
An employer is required to provide personal protective equipment where the risk assessment indicates as much. Risk assessment is the cornerstone of industrial safety and statutory bodies require employers to undertake one to determine what hazards can reasonably be expected in any particular working environment. There is always the chance of accident but risk assessments are not expected to be clairvoyant. They are expected to review routine operations and recommend the proper Personal Protective Equipment. (The employer is also expected to pay for it.) Risk assessments are expected to be 'reasonable' and the onus is on OSHA to prove otherwise.
There are two important things to remember. Firstly, it is the employer who decides how best to comply with the law. Secondly, organizations like OSHA do not mandate any particular piece of equipment to be used.
In the case of foot safety, OSHA’s occupational foot protection standard is 29 CFR 1910.136. This requires the use of protective footwear when employees are working in areas where there is a danger of foot injuries due to falling or rolling objects. Once that hazard has been determined, OSHA does not recommend, or approve of, any particular safety footwear. According to OSHA in a recent letter to the United States Postal Service, an employer may comply with the criteria set forth in ANSI Z41-1991, replaced by the American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) F2412-05 and ASTM F2413-05, or the employer may opt to demonstrate that other criteria are equally effective. If the employer pursues the second option, then compliance with the consensus standards is not mandatory. This means, the burden lies on the employer to demonstrate that the footwear provided is equally as protective as the footwear that meet the ASTM F2412-05 and the ASTM F2413-05 standards.
In another fairly recent ruling, OSHA declined to comment on the suitability of the now ubiquitous ‘Croc’ clogs. It said, in situations where no hazard exists, the matter of appropriate footwear at work is between the employer and employee. This principle was reiterated when OSHA was asked to comment on rubber over-shoes. OSHA was firm in stating that it does not find rubber overshoes acceptable where they provide no toe protection. However, provided they can demonstrate that they meet minimum standards they are acceptable.
What then would be “acceptable foot protection” where there is a chance of toe injury? The first choice of many employers is ASTM or CSA tagged safety shoes or boots - the so called "approved" footwear we hear so much about in advertising. For sure, a fully loaded safety shoe or boot will provide more than enough legal defence in the event of a challenge from OSHA. What is also true is that such a policy comes at a very high cost. Not every employee requires safety toecap, steel-soled, electricity dissipative footwear. For many work situations only toe protection from falling or rolling heavy objects is required. Is it wise then to incur the full cost of a safety shoe or boot?
For example, an office worker visiting a loading dock to pick up documents will not perform any manufacturing duties while en route. This might imply that the PPE provided to the workers may not be necessary for the office worker. However, since the office worker might be exposed to falling objects, or in close proximity to heavy moving equipment, it would be reasonable to foresee only the need for toe protection against impact and compression.
In another situation a risk assessment for the production area might indicate the need for slip resistant footwear and toe protection. However, it is also reasonable to expect that a visiting office worker might not encounter slippery conditions. Furthermore, such conditions are not supposed to persist and it might be reasonable to expect the office worker to take reasonable evasive action to avoid the risk should it occur.
The danger from sharp objects underfoot requires steel sole protective footwear but where no such risk is anticipated toe protection may be all that is required. A good example would be the paper-making and the newspaper print production industry, where there is little chance of sharp objects but always a chance of rolling stock or heavy moving equipment that can injure toes. Having steel sole shoes or boots that can dissipate electrical shock is just over-kill and costly.
Rubber safetytoe overshoes provide the same protection from impact and compression as safety shoes and boots. The steel toecap meets the same ASTM standards and can easily be verified by test results from the major testing bodies. This is what makes OSHA happy. Rubber has been used for a long time in the safety footwear industry and its slip resistance qualities are well known. The rubber material is flexible but sturdy, in some cases as thick as 6mm resulting in a firm fit and some long wearing characteristics. Rubber safetytoe overshoes are a lot less expensive than safety shoes or boots and they eliminate the hazard of passing along unsanitary footwear. They are especially useful where only occasional toe protection is required, such as with visitors to production facilities, temporary workers and for medical reasons.
Safety personnel looking for budget savings, as in today’s economy, would be well advised to consider them for these reasons and more.
Patrick Smyth aka Mister Safetytoes
“Toe the line or foot the bill” is OSHA’s motto and few would disagree with it. Economising on safety costs is something few would argue with either. So, here's a safety shoe alternative you should know about. Rubber overshoe safety toe caps - ' shoes with toes' - are getting more attention, for more reasons than simply cost-effectiveness. And not just because of the ever increasing numbers of temporary workers employed in this country. It's the ever increasing cost of providing fully-loaded temporary safety shoes that's bringing the whole matter of toe protection to the attention of senior management. The recent challenge by the United States Postal Service and OSHA's ruling attests to that. Anywhere a safety shoe alternative exists, that sits all right with OSHA in the USA or CCOHS in Canada, it's a win-win situation.
There’s not a thing wrong with generally accepted safety toe cap footwear, but all too often it seems the expensive choice is selected out of fear or a lack of understanding. Although it's true to say safety shoe policies in manufacturing have embraced rubber pull on safety toe cap products for visitors they have been 'missing in action' elsewhere. I know of one particular food processing plant that refuses to use a '”better than those yellow clacker things” solution, but tolerates gunk that might be introduced to the production floor on the soles of visitors' shoes. Their thinking is they had better address the greasy floors than more effectively provide toe protection. Some might argue the greasy floor is a hazard that should not be tolerated.
All employers are subject to statutory requirements and minimum standards that reflect our desire to protect workers. It is up to the employer to implement safety rules and regulations but bodies such as OSHA allows significant latitude in doing so, provided choices are reasonable and done responsibly. Careful attention is required as errors in judgement, as with willful neglect, will be punished under the law. Unfortunately, the tendency in a fear and compliance atmosphere is to avoid failure rather than attempt success. Compliance is commendable but can instill fear. That can stifle creativity which can result in unnecessarily high costs.
Take the whole matter of safety footwear. Company safety policies that lack creativity can result in over-spending far in excess of the typical fine for a safety transgression. It's a bit like this; we know there's always the possibility of rain but do we need to wear a raincoat every day? Or, would a small umbrella, costing a lot less than a raincoat, do the job just as well? Throw in the ability to offer others shelter if the need arises and you get the idea.
An employer is required to provide personal protective equipment where the risk assessment indicates as much. Risk assessment is the cornerstone of industrial safety and statutory bodies require employers to undertake one to determine what hazards can reasonably be expected in any particular working environment. There is always the chance of accident but risk assessments are not expected to be clairvoyant. They are expected to review routine operations and recommend the proper Personal Protective Equipment. (The employer is also expected to pay for it.) Risk assessments are expected to be 'reasonable' and the onus is on OSHA to prove otherwise.
There are two important things to remember. Firstly, it is the employer who decides how best to comply with the law. Secondly, organizations like OSHA do not mandate any particular piece of equipment to be used.
In the case of foot safety, OSHA’s occupational foot protection standard is 29 CFR 1910.136. This requires the use of protective footwear when employees are working in areas where there is a danger of foot injuries due to falling or rolling objects. Once that hazard has been determined, OSHA does not recommend, or approve of, any particular safety footwear. According to OSHA in a recent letter to the United States Postal Service, an employer may comply with the criteria set forth in ANSI Z41-1991, replaced by the American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) F2412-05 and ASTM F2413-05, or the employer may opt to demonstrate that other criteria are equally effective. If the employer pursues the second option, then compliance with the consensus standards is not mandatory. This means, the burden lies on the employer to demonstrate that the footwear provided is equally as protective as the footwear that meet the ASTM F2412-05 and the ASTM F2413-05 standards.
In another fairly recent ruling, OSHA declined to comment on the suitability of the now ubiquitous ‘Croc’ clogs. It said, in situations where no hazard exists, the matter of appropriate footwear at work is between the employer and employee. This principle was reiterated when OSHA was asked to comment on rubber over-shoes. OSHA was firm in stating that it does not find rubber overshoes acceptable where they provide no toe protection. However, provided they can demonstrate that they meet minimum standards they are acceptable.
What then would be “acceptable foot protection” where there is a chance of toe injury? The first choice of many employers is ASTM or CSA tagged safety shoes or boots - the so called "approved" footwear we hear so much about in advertising. For sure, a fully loaded safety shoe or boot will provide more than enough legal defence in the event of a challenge from OSHA. What is also true is that such a policy comes at a very high cost. Not every employee requires safety toecap, steel-soled, electricity dissipative footwear. For many work situations only toe protection from falling or rolling heavy objects is required. Is it wise then to incur the full cost of a safety shoe or boot?
For example, an office worker visiting a loading dock to pick up documents will not perform any manufacturing duties while en route. This might imply that the PPE provided to the workers may not be necessary for the office worker. However, since the office worker might be exposed to falling objects, or in close proximity to heavy moving equipment, it would be reasonable to foresee only the need for toe protection against impact and compression.
In another situation a risk assessment for the production area might indicate the need for slip resistant footwear and toe protection. However, it is also reasonable to expect that a visiting office worker might not encounter slippery conditions. Furthermore, such conditions are not supposed to persist and it might be reasonable to expect the office worker to take reasonable evasive action to avoid the risk should it occur.
The danger from sharp objects underfoot requires steel sole protective footwear but where no such risk is anticipated toe protection may be all that is required. A good example would be the paper-making and the newspaper print production industry, where there is little chance of sharp objects but always a chance of rolling stock or heavy moving equipment that can injure toes. Having steel sole shoes or boots that can dissipate electrical shock is just over-kill and costly.
Rubber safetytoe overshoes provide the same protection from impact and compression as safety shoes and boots. The steel toecap meets the same ASTM standards and can easily be verified by test results from the major testing bodies. This is what makes OSHA happy. Rubber has been used for a long time in the safety footwear industry and its slip resistance qualities are well known. The rubber material is flexible but sturdy, in some cases as thick as 6mm resulting in a firm fit and some long wearing characteristics. Rubber safetytoe overshoes are a lot less expensive than safety shoes or boots and they eliminate the hazard of passing along unsanitary footwear. They are especially useful where only occasional toe protection is required, such as with visitors to production facilities, temporary workers and for medical reasons.
Safety personnel looking for budget savings, as in today’s economy, would be well advised to consider them for these reasons and more.
Patrick Smyth aka Mister Safetytoes
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)